9 Comments
User's avatar
Donna J Hilbert's avatar

I tell my workshop students to use Diane Lockward's guidelines and their manuscripts will be in great shape wherever they chose to submit. I agree with 95% of what Diane says here. And where I differ, is personal. In my own work, birds will be present in many poems because I live at the beach. Herons and brown pelicans are a big deal here.

Expand full comment
Renee Emerson's avatar

This is solid advice! I particularly appreciate your observations on over-used trends in poetry right now (herons, etc.).

Expand full comment
Diane lockward's avatar

Thanks! Glad you’ve found it helpful.

Expand full comment
Kim Nelson's avatar

An incredible resource for writers!

Expand full comment
Laurie Rosen's avatar

I have a question about epigraphs. The title of one of my poems is a line from a Wallace Steven's poem (and I am also using the title as my first line.) I use the epigraph "after Wallace Steven's" but my critique group suggested I state it at the end of the poem. I disagreed but understand that they felt the epigraph chopped things up. Anyone want to weigh in on this?

Expand full comment
Mark Danowsky's avatar

I think it's really a personal choice. Poetry readers are used to the attribution appearing under the title (often indented and in italics). For me, putting it at the end draws more attention.

Expand full comment
RSA's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 16
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Mark Danowsky's avatar

That's totally fair!

I wouldn't mind more use of footnotes. Flipping to the back is something I'm not usually inclined to do.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 17
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Mark Danowsky's avatar

I like that. A good strategy.

Expand full comment